diff --git a/Proxies-and-CAPTCHAs%3A-Running-a-Setup-that-Holds-Up.md b/Proxies-and-CAPTCHAs%3A-Running-a-Setup-that-Holds-Up.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..abbb2e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Proxies-and-CAPTCHAs%3A-Running-a-Setup-that-Holds-Up.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+Good docs plus examples make adoption faster. Between the setup guide to the API reference and the FAQ, most questions have clear answers without you ask, so your team puts effort on shipping rather than firefighting.
+
+Google reCAPTCHA v2 is one of the most common challenges on the web, covering the familiar checkbox to invisible and callback versions. CapSkip handles all of these locally quickly, which means your scraper does not stall every time one shows up. Since it emulates popular solver APIs, hooking it up is painless.
+
+A frequent misstep is treating every solver as if interchangeable. Match the solver to the challenge types, your scale, and your cost ceiling - CapSkip spans image CAPTCHAs, reCAPTCHA and Turnstile at one price, which fits the majority of real projects.
+
+CapSkip's API is designed to mirror the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, scripts and scripts that currently target those services can point at CapSkip with minimal changes and zero coding.
+
+Data control is a genuine issue when every challenge is sent to a third-party service. Because CapSkip runs locally, no challenge data departs your hardware, so sensitive projects stay on your own systems. For sensitive data, this can be the deciding factor.
+
+Good docs plus tutorials shorten adoption faster. From the setup guide to the API reference and an FAQ, the common questions have answered without you ask, so your team puts time on building instead of troubleshooting.
+
+Web scraping remains among the most common reasons people reach for a CAPTCHA solver. One blocked page can halt an whole run, so solving challenges automatically keeps the pipeline predictable. CapSkip fits these workflows cleanly.
+
+Data collection remains among the most common reasons people reach for a CAPTCHA solver. One stalled page will halt an whole run, so solving challenges on the fly keeps the pipeline predictable. CapSkip slots into such workflows cleanly.
+
+Used responsibly, [captcha automation tool](https://www.bandeniahomes.com/author/suzannevanatta/) solving supports valid work such as QA, accessibility, and permitted data collection. Always wise respecting each target's terms and applicable rules; used that way, a solver is simply a productivity tool.
+
+Selenium remains a staple for browser automation, and CapSkip drops right in. You keep the WebDriver flow unchanged and delegate the challenge to CapSkip when one appears, so the session keeps going without manual steps.
+
+CapSkip's extension brings solving right into Chrome, Firefox and Chromium browsers such as Brave, Opera and Edge. If you do manual tasks or quick automation, the extension clears challenges and needs no any configuration.
+
+Good documentation plus tutorials shorten adoption smoother. From the setup guide to the API reference and an FAQ, the common questions have clear answers before you filing a ticket, so your team spends effort on building rather than troubleshooting.
+
+Teams migrating from 2Captcha often brace for a painful switch. In practice, because CapSkip mirrors the familiar request format, the change is mostly a matter of the endpoint and keeping the rest the same.
+
+The developer API was built to mirror the endpoints of the major CAPTCHA-solving services. In practical terms, scripts and scripts that already target other services are able to switch to CapSkip needing minimal changes and zero new code.
+
+Web scraping remains one of the top use cases people reach for a CAPTCHA solver. A single stalled request can halt an whole run, so solving challenges automatically keeps throughput steady. CapSkip fits such workflows neatly.
+
+GeeTest challenges can be notoriously tricky for automation, so having a tool that supports them is a real plus. CapSkip handles GeeTest locally, so workflows that rely on these sites keep running whenever the puzzle appears.
+
+A common misstep is simply picking any solver as if interchangeable. Match the solver to your challenge mix, the scale, and your cost ceiling - CapSkip spans the common types at one price, which suits most real workloads.
+
+Classic image and text CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, on sign-up pages to registration screens. CapSkip recognizes thousands of image CAPTCHA types locally, typically almost instantly. This throughput matters the moment you handle large numbers of challenges.
+
+A major advantages of processing locally comes down to cost. Most services charge per solve, so your bill climb the moment throughput increases. CapSkip uses flat-rate pricing and uncapped solves,  [https://git.wytfy.xyz/](https://git.wytfy.xyz/uleangelita558/4779www.capskip.com/wiki/Quit+Overpaying+Per+Solve%253A+A+Case+for+Local+CapSkip) so scaling without watching the meter.
+
+Concurrent solving is the point at which self-hosted solving really pays off. Since you have no external throttle tied to your bill, teams can spread jobs across numerous workers and still keep costs flat.
+
+Privacy has become a real concern when every challenge is sent to a remote service. With CapSkip, no challenge data departs your machine, so sensitive workflows stay contained. For sensitive work, this is often the clincher.
+
+Accessibility testing frequently runs into CAPTCHAs when checking sign-in pages. Rather than dropping those checks, teams let CapSkip solve the challenge on the machine so test runs stay thorough and consistent.
\ No newline at end of file